deltalounge

In October 2009 I posted about the announcement of the SOA Manifesto during the SOA Symposium 2009. For those of you interested, InfoQ has interviewed the original author’s and in some cases pulled in their comments on the manifesto from the web to get insight into the motivations and the process behind the initiative. The answers are gathered under the name SOA Manifesto – 4 months after. The article looks into the following subjects:

• The philosophy
• The process
• The goals

Find the complete article here.

Today I give a presentation at the Oracle NL 25 years event – Celebrating a tradition in innovation. Although there are a lot of pictures the words are in Dutch, as was the language of the audience…
The story is based around practises developed in the last five years working on SOA projects. Despite all the desillusions on SOA projects that get a lot of attention this year, good results are achieved for our customers using these practises and guidelines. I’ll elaborate on them in future blogposts.

Still searching for the correct answer on the question: What skyline is in the picture on slide 12?

In the SOA still dead blogpost based on his impression of the SOA Symposium 2009, Joe McKendrick asks the question:

Is SOA still dead?

My personal opinion is that SOA is still alive or reanimated. The declaration of the SOA Manifesto has contributed to this. The least it has done is start discussion online and offline. These discussions will lead to a better understanding for the participants and those following them. The result will be more mature and successful (in business terms not technology) SOA implementations. This would be quite an achievement if the statistics that Anne Thomas Manes presented are accurate:

fewer than 10% of companies have seen significant business value in their SOA efforts.

Although the quotes on this page seem rather negative, I’m still an optimist on the case for SOA. It brings us solid principles and guidance in developing software of better quality.

Views on the SOA Symposium

The proclamation of the SOA Manifesto has resulted in most of the blogpost on the SOA Symposium. However there are post dedicated to a broader spectrum of the SOA Symposium. These give an impression or reflect back on things.

Reading the blog of Linda Terlouw, I remembered having the same expectations on the “Service-Oriented Solution Evaluation Criteria” session: some info on how you can measure whether or not (or to which extent) a service conforms to certain principles. Instead it was a summary of the principles as they are defined by Thomas Erl.

Comments, like this one, are appreciated.

At the end of the SOA Symposium 2009 the SOA Manifesto was ready and declared. It is based on these principles.

SOA Manifesto

Service orientation is a paradigm that frames what you do. Service-oriented
architecture (SOA) is a type of architecture that results from applying service
orientation. We have been applying service orientation to help organizations
consistently deliver sustainable business value, with increased agility and
cost effectiveness, in line with changing business needs.
Through our work we have come to prioritize:

Business value over technical strategy
Strategic goals over project-specific benefits
Intrinsic interoperability over custom integration
Shared services over specific-purpose implementations
Flexibility over optimization
Evolutionary refinement over pursuit of initial perfection

That is, while we value the items on the right, we value the items on the left more.

source
You can watch the Announcement of the SOA Manifesto on Youtube.

The manifesto was signed and declared by: Ali Arsanjani, Grady Booch, Toufic Boubez, Paul C. Brown, David Chappell, John deVadoss, Thomas Erl, Nicolai Josuttis, Dirk Krafzig, Mark Little, Brian Loesgen, Anne Thomas Manes, Joe McKendrick, Steve Ross-Talbot, Stefan Tilkov, Clemens Utschig-Utschig, Herbjörn Wilhelmsen. Soon you can join them in signing the manifesto on soa-manifesto.org.

Update Oct. 26th
I found some blogposts of people participating in the creation of the SOA Manifesto: Clemens Utschig and Stefan Tilkov

October 22th

• arrived at the #soasym09
• there will be a reincarnation of SOA #soasym09 – @atmanes – focus on the hard work of architecture
• replaying The Exorcist at the EVIL SOA including the chanting: I cast thy out!!
• the exorcism of the Evil SOA wasn’t a pretty sight #soasym09
• Oh, and there is Good SOA Up – in an angeliclike shape and character – pure goodness #soasym09
• RT while others state cloud requires SOA… @bvanzomeren: “joe mckendrick: cloud is soa done right #soasym09″
• First blogpost from the #soasym09 http://bit.ly/2Tud0V
• Services are enterprise assets and have to be managed like these #soasym09
• is the gap between IT and Business just a reflection of the left – right brain difference? as discussed at #soasym09 . lets explore this
• Achieving process excellence “co-hosted” by IDS Scheer and Software AG #soasym09
• there hasn’t been a session #soasym09 that mentioned chaos in some shape or form #entropy !?
• feeling Appleless tweeting n blogging from #soasym09 – have to find a sponsor or budget
• Grady Booch joins us at #soasym09 via Second Life

October 22th

• another virtual keynote at #soasym09 – Dennis Wisnosky of the DoD
• Interesting session on SOA Governance by Steve Pope (AmberPoint) will check the demo at their booth #soasym09
• very lively, enthousiast session on Smart Use Cases by @aahoogendoorn #soasym09
• received a draft manuscript of the SOA with REST book by Thomas Erl ea #soasym09
• has the ESB become a commodity? #soasym09
• RT agree @bvanzomeren: interesting talk of @lindaterlouw and A d hertog about the road enterprise architecture to portal and esb #soasym09″
• The SOA Manifesto is presented at #soasym09
• RT @soasym: “Wordle of #soasym09 http://ow.ly/waEv”
• RT @atmanes: “The SOA Manifesto is complete. It will be published shortly on http://soa-manifesto.org” #soasym09

All tweets on SOA Symposium

All tweets on th SOA Symposium can be found here. As they used the #soasym09 that is…. The Wordle is available here.

In this blogspost I’ll share a few thoughts I took from the afternoons sessions at the first day of SOA Symposium 2009.

The Techie Gap

Since architects, software engineers, and the like, are seen as techies (at least from a business perspective) Jaap Schekkerman argues that there is a gap between how these two populations actually use there brain. This is considered at least one of the reasons why IT projects fail.

But first let’s take a step back. Architecture is about:

• Style
• Functions – including aspects like adaptabillity and usefulness
• Construction – including aspects like durability and maintenance

Business people having a dominant right brain style are mostly interested in Style, and sometimes in Functions. On the other hand, architects – being mostly on the left brain dominant side of the scale – seem to have a sweet spot for Construction. This sometimes expands to Functions.
Where right brainers favor “the broad picture”, and left brainers have an analytical “brain for details” (would have used heart, but feeling don’t seem to be their thing). There comes a gap because of different interests in their communication.

A solution for smaller projects to bridge the gap is limit both scope and depth in meetings, and other interactions between these groups.

A more profound solution that is given by Jaap Schekkerman is to use a “Real Enterprise Architect”. Where he defines the role of an Enterprise Architect as:

To be a business and IT communicator.

A person in this role as he sees it has a very broad set of skills and capabilities.

Fundamentals never go out of style – Grady Booch

Grady Booch was very kind to join us via Second Life at a time that he would normally be sleeping (OK; it is an assumption from my side that he would love to sleep at 04:00 in the morning). Fortunately he still managed to give a interesting keynote.

Here are some quotes that I recognised from my own experience:

All architecture is design; not all design is architecture.

Architecture is about all the decisions that are made during a creation process. In this process thousands of small and larger choices are made. It is easy to see, how this can lead to the following:

Most architectures are accidently; Some architectures are intentionally.

With these statements in the back of our head it is good to see that fundamentals keep offering solutions. Here are some classics that can give you guidance:

• Use crisp abstractions
• Aim at a clear separation of concerns
• Distribute responsabilities
• Simplicity is the key

There were some great sessions on the first morning of the 2009 edition of the SOA Symposium. One that is again dedicated to “substance only”. The keynotes of Thomas Erl and Anne Thomas Manes basically went on where the blogpost ended, and declared “SOA is dead, long live Services”. Most people forgot to read the last part of that statement. At the same time we’ll see that Architecture will play a main role in Next Generation SOA.

The New SOA is all about Architecture.

If we are not going to use the architectural principals and patterns, we won’t be able to “clean the house”. This will leave us with the same problems as we had before… only now they have a SOA sauce on top of them. Business is not interested in this somewhat technology flavored sauce. And that is what makes it hard to sell SOA to the business!

Exorcism of the bad SOA

Before we can go to the new and improved SOA, we have to lose the old one. So a real “exorcism” based on the movie was held, as a ritual to leave the past behind. This left us with the question what the New Good SOA will look like. Here are some clues:

• SOA is something you DO, not something you buy – which is not the easiest statement with al these vendors around
• SOA doesn’t have to be large scale – This will take away some of the burdens of the enterprise wide scope, that has difficulty with timely delivery and showing business value within a reasonable time.
• It is about business value – Leaving us with the question how to measure the value of a paradigm? One of the answers lies in the search for metrics for the values of (business) Services.

A lot of other possible buzz words – Cloud, BPM, SaaS, and Mashup – depend on the success of the Good SOA. This will leave SOA a prerequisite for the future.

October 22-23 the SOA Symposium 2009 will be hosted in the World Trade Center – Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Besides the Second Annual International SOA Symposium, the International Cloud Symposium will be launched at the same time, as a bonus co-located conference. There will be over 80 speakers including recognized thought leaders, such as Thomas Erl, Grady Booch, Anne Thomas Manes, Joe McKendrick, David Chappell, Dirk Krafzig, Jim Webber, Nicolai Josuttis, Paul Brown, Mark Little, Clemens Utschig, and Torsten Winterberg.

The theme of the symposium – Next Generation SOA – is explained by Thomas Erl in SOA Magazine of April 2009 :

Next Generation SOA represents how the evolution of service-oriented computing has reached a point where we have not just mature technology platforms and sophisticated modern service technology innovations at our disposal, but also proven practices, patterns, principles, and a clear vision of the target state represented by service-oriented computing.

During the symposium the latest title – Next Generation SOA: A Real-World Guide to Modern Service-Oriented Computing – in The Prentice Hall Service-Oriented Computing Series will be launched.

SOA Manifesto announcement

This event is chosen by leading SOA experts as the location at which the SOA Manifesto will be finalized and, for the first time, announced. The SOA Manifesto is:

A formal declaration of the principles, intentions and ambitions of service-orientation and the service-oriented architectural model.

This announcement will be video recorded and the video file, along with the first draft of the SOA Manifesto, will be published on this site. The final manifesto may be entitled the “Next Generation SOA Manifesto”. Which perfectly fits the theme of the SOA Symposium.

Will we meet there?

I would like to meet you there. Use this site to register. Note that several partners of 10% discount (Oracle, Via Nova Architectura, and DNV).
If you won’t be able to make it, follow this blog. There will be several posts during the event.

Last years resources

In the meantime you can use last years resources and visit the 2008 presentations on slideshare.

Last week the Open Group released the SOA Book. It is described as “a collection of source material for use by enterprise architects working with Service-Oriented Architecture“. No surprise that it is (partially) based on TOGAF.

I like the overview in the features and benefits pages. The benefits are described on a less abstract level than the strategic goals of SOA described by Erl. At the same time Erl keeps more consequent in touch with the goals, for example when describing SOA Patterns. Besides that some of the features in the SOA Book are neither specific nor required for SOA implementation (Asset Wrapping, Model-Driven Implementation). That doesn’t help to get a clear definition and grasp on what SOA is.

No doubt that management of change, also known as governance, gets some attention in the book. The presented SOA Governance Vitality Method (SGVM) is a specification of the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle. It could be of help as a checklist when managing a SOA project.

Although it wasn’t the first subject most people thought of, after the announcement that Oracle wants to acquire Sun Microsystems, both have a well equipped stack of products for integration, and to create the software infrastructure for a SOA. This post will go into that part of the acquisition in more detail. Based on web resources and analyst reports, we are looking for synergy and additions to the product portfolio.

Sun

Sun’s platform for integration is Java Composite Application Platform Suite (Java CAPS). For the larger part this came with the acquisition of SeeBeyond. Before that ICAN, as it was called, was SeeBeyond’s flagship product. It’s roots are in the EAI market. CAPS in turn is a sub package of JES.

Gartner sees Sun, with the Java CAPS products, as a visionair (other link). Primarily because of a lag of mind share of the CAPS compared to other suites in the market, and because of less focus on this open-source component compared to others, including Solaris, MySQL, and GlassFish. Sun is recognized for it’s open-source leadership, broad comprehensive set of enterprise application infrastructure technologies, and leadership in the Java Community Process.

In the most recent Forrester Wave for Integration Centric BPMS, Java CAPS is seen as a “competitive solution”. This is mainly due to lower scores in the areas of B2B, BPM, and the incomplete overall product strategy.

Oracle

With the SOA Suite, Oracle has a great (software) platform for enterprise scale integration and service-oriented architecture. Which is in the process of being enriched with the BEA product at the time of writing.

Forrester regards Oracle as a repeat in the Leader category based on the comprehensive capabilities of its SOA Suite product. Trough the acquisition of BEA, Oracle inherited some key products such as the enterprise service bus and repository.

Besides the praise for the SOA Suite Gartner stresses the downside of this acquisition: The massive effort that will be needed to integrate BEA Systems’ technologies into Oracle’s original products. This will absorb a significant part of Oracle’s R&D resources. In addition there is not yet a clear migration path for existing customers.

Perspective

With the acquisition of Sun Microsystems, Oracle gains the customers base of CAPS. Because of Oracle’s reputation in the market, it remains to be seen whether the leadership in both the open-source and Java EE community can be capitalized. But still, when Oracle owns Sun, Oracle will “own” Java EE, the platform of many, if not most, enterprise SOA deployments…

The downside of the acquisition, that R&D focus will be on integration instead of on development of new features and releases, will gain weight. Here consolidation will be in the way of innovation. Combined with the unclear migration path, this will affect customers in the process of choosing a suite of products to support them in their integration effort, or the software infrastructure to support a SOA implementation.